MOIS Must Be Designated As A Terrorist Organization By The US And EU

MOIS must be designated as an FTO by the US and EU

How can we be safe against FTOs’ threats in Europe?

Is it not the time for the west to face the reality that this state-sponsor of terrorism has passed their doorsteps?

Moreover, for how long do the western governments want to close their eyes on MOIS’s role in terror attacks? And the main question is, when will the US and EU believe that the Ministry of Intelligence and Security of Iran’s regime (MOIS) is absolutely an FTO?

Some weeks ago, the Europeans became aware of the shocking terrorist plot masterminded by the MOIS agent against the gathering held by the Iranian opposition in Paris, which was attended by more than 100,000 Iranian dissidents and hundreds of the prominent figures from five continents to support Mrs. Maryam Rajavi for a Free Iran.

Message to the conference “Iran’s New Wave of Terrorism”- Brussels October 4, 2018

In this regard, a Belgian special unit stopped a couple in Brussels in possession of 500 grams of the TATP powerful explosive and a detonator.

MOIS agents, under cover of “Diplomats”, plot terror attacks

Following the arrest of the terrorist couple, German police arrested a senior diplomat of Iran’s regime who had masterminded the terror attack and had personally delivered the TATP to the terrorists in Strasburg.

After arresting this so-called diplomat, Assadollah Assadi, the European police announced, “Since 2014, Assadi has been accredited as working for the MOIS to monitor the opposition groups while being at Iran’s embassy in Vienna”.

In fact, the European police revealed the regime’s deception as to covering up its MOIS agents as diplomats to pursue its terror operations in Europe.

According to the evidence, the MOIS operations include espionage and striking blows to the opposition.

The Politics That Led to the MEK's Wrongful Terrorist Designation in the Us

The Iranian Resistance group, the Mujahedin-e Khalq (PMOI/MEK), was wrongfully on the US’s list of Foreign Terrorist Organisations  until 2012, but how did it wind up there in the first place?
Let’s take a little look.

The MEK was put on the FTO but evidence suggests it had little to do with the MEK’s actions or beliefs. Instead, the US wanted engagement with the Iranian Regime, which apparently looked to be a permanent fixture in the Middle East by the 1990s, and the simplest way to do that was to label the MEK as a terrorist group. The West didn’t see regime change as an option then.

This was even admitted to by Martin Indyk, Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs in the Clinton Administration, who said: “[There] was White House interest in opening up a dialogue with the Iranian government. Top Administration officials saw cracking down on the [MEK], which the Iranians had made clear they saw as a menace, as one way to do so.”

This is similar to the tactics used in the 1980s during the Iran-Contra scandal. In exchange for the release of American hostages being held in Lebanon by proxies of the Iranian Regime, the US State Department had to issue a statement accusing the MEK of terrorism. The Tower Commission Report cited a letter from Iranian negotiator, Manouchehr Ghorbanifar, to his US counterpart, which listed that as one of nine demands from the Regime.

A decade later, the State Department added the MEK to the FTO to appease Iranian President Mohammad Khatami, wrongly perceived as a moderate by the US.

A senior Clinton administration official even admitted this to the LA Times. They said: “The inclusion of the People’s Mujahedin was intended as a goodwill gesture to Tehran and its newly elected president, Mohammed Khatami.”

The evidence that the West provided to justify the designation was shaky at best. They alleged that: